Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

The callback function I'm working with has the following signature (from http://api.jquery.com/load/):

complete(responseText, textStatus, XMLHttpRequest)

Now, I only need the third parameter. In Lua there's a convention where an underscore is used to skip unneeded return values from functions (skip because _ will actually hold the value):

var1, _, _, var4 = func()

So I thought of doing a similar thing with JavaScript and set my function signature to this:

function (_, _, XMLHttpRequest)

Is there anything wrong with this approach, perhaps there's a better/cleaner way?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
280 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

The technique is not pretty, but I use it myself on several occasions. I guess it is still quite better to give those unused arguments meaningful names (just to avoid confusion), but you're fine in using underscores.

I often see it used in jQuery related callbacks, where the index is often passed in as first argument, like

$('.foo').each(function(_, node) {
});

because most of the time, you don't care about the index there. So to answer your actual question, there is nothing wrong in using the technique (beside confusion maybe) and there is no better/cleaner way to skip unwanted arguments.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...