Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I've been looking into GraphQL as a replacement for some REST APIs of mine, and while I think I've wrapped my head around the basics and like most of what I see so far, there's one important feature that seems to be missing.

Let's say I've got a collection of items like this:

{
    "id": "aaa",
    "name": "Item 1",
    ...
}

An application needs a map of all those objects, indexed by ID as such:

{
    "allItems": {
        "aaa": {
            "name": "Item 1",
            ...
        },
        "aab": {
            "name": "Item 2",
            ...
        }
    }
}

Every API I've ever written has been able to give results back in a format like this, but I'm struggling to find a way to do it with GraphQL. I keep running across issue 101, but that deals more with unknown schemas. In my case, I know exactly what all the fields are; this is purely about output format. I know I could simply return all the items in an array and reformat it client-side, but that seems like overkill given that it's never been needed in the past, and would make GraphQL feel like a step backwards. I'm not sure if what I'm trying to do is impossible, or I'm just using all the wrong terminology. Should I keep digging, or is GraphQL just not suited to my needs? If this is possible, what might a query look like to retrieve data like this?

I'm currently working with graphql-php on the server, but I'm open to higher-level conceptual responses.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
417 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

Unfortunately returning objects with arbitrary and dynamic keys like this is not really a first-class citizen in GraphQL. That is not to say you can't achieve the same thing, but in doing so you will lose many of the benefits of GraphQL.

If you are set on returning an object with id keys instead of returning a collection/list of objects containing the ids and then doing the transformation on the client then you can create a special GraphQLScalarType.

const GraphQLAnyObject = new GraphQLScalarType({
  name: 'AnyObject',
  description: 'Any JSON object. This type bypasses type checking.',
  serialize: value => {
    return value;
  },
  parseValue: value => {
    return value;
  },
  parseLiteral: ast => {
    if (ast.kind !== Kind.OBJECT) {
      throw new GraphQLError("Query error: Can only parse object but got a: " + ast.kind, [ast]);
    }
    return ast.value;
  }
});

The problem with this approach is that since it is a scalar type you cannot supply a selection set to query it. E.G. if you had a type

type MyType implements Node {
  id: ID!
  myKeyedCollection: AnyObject
}

Then you would only be able to query it like so

query {
  getMyType(id: abc) {
    myKeyedCollection  # note there is no { ... }
  }
}

As others have said, I wouldn't recommend this because you are losing a lot of the benefits of GraphQL but it goes to show that GraphQL can still do pretty much anything REST can.

Hope this helps!


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share

548k questions

547k answers

4 comments

86.3k users

...