Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

This question is an enhancement to the already answered question How to apply multiple filter conditions (simultaneously) on a list?

In the above mentioned question we have a method that applied AND operator on all the specifications. This is achieved by using LINQ All operator on the specifications.

    public static List<Product> GetProductsUisngAndFilters(List<Product> productList, List<Specification<Product>> productSpecifications)
    {
        return productList.Where(p => productSpecifications.All(ps => ps.IsSatisfiedBy(p))).ToList();
    }

We need to create a new method (GetProductsUisngDynamicFilters) that is capable of performing AND, OR and NOT specifications (and a mix of that). Any idea how we can solve this?

Filter Methods

public static class ProductFilterHelper
{
     public static List<Product> GetProductsUisngAndFilters(List<Product> productList, List<Specification<Product>> productSpecifications)
    {
        return productList.Where(p => productSpecifications.All(ps => ps.IsSatisfiedBy(p))).ToList();
    }
}

Client

class Program
{

    static void Main(string[] args)
    {

        List<Product> list = new List<Product>();

        Product p1 = new Product(false, 99);
        Product p2 = new Product(true, 99);
        Product p3 = new Product(true, 101);
        Product p4 = new Product(true, 110);
        Product p5 = new Product(false, 110);

        list.Add(p1);
        list.Add(p2);
        list.Add(p3);
        list.Add(p4);
        list.Add(p5);

        double priceLimit = 100;

        List<Specification<Product>> specifications = new List<Specification<Product>>();
        specifications.Add(new OnSaleSpecificationForProduct());
        specifications.Add(new PriceGreaterThanSpecificationForProduct(priceLimit));
        specifications.Add(new PriceGreaterThan105());

        List<Product> selectedList = ProductFilterHelper.GetProductsBasedOnInputFilters(list, specifications);

        Console.ReadKey();
    }

}

Abstract Specifications

public abstract class Specification<T>
{
    public abstract bool IsSatisfiedBy(T obj);

    public AndSpecification<T> And(Specification<T> specification)
    {
        return new AndSpecification<T>(this, specification);
    }

    public OrSpecification<T> Or(Specification<T> specification)
    {
        return new OrSpecification<T>(this, specification);
    }

    public NotSpecification<T> Not(Specification<T> specification)
    {
        return new NotSpecification<T>(this, specification);
    }
}

public abstract class CompositeSpecification<T> : Specification<T>
{
    protected readonly Specification<T> _leftSide;
    protected readonly Specification<T> _rightSide;

    public CompositeSpecification(Specification<T> leftSide, Specification<T> rightSide)
    {
        _leftSide = leftSide;
        _rightSide = rightSide;
    }
}

Generic Specifications

public class AndSpecification<T> : CompositeSpecification<T>
{
    public AndSpecification(Specification<T> leftSide, Specification<T> rightSide)
        : base(leftSide, rightSide)
    {

    }

    public override bool IsSatisfiedBy(T obj)
    {
        return _leftSide.IsSatisfiedBy(obj) && _rightSide.IsSatisfiedBy(obj);
    }
}

public class OrSpecification<T> : CompositeSpecification<T>
{
    public OrSpecification(Specification<T> leftSide, Specification<T> rightSide)
        : base(leftSide, rightSide)
    {
    }

    public override bool IsSatisfiedBy(T obj)
    {
        return _leftSide.IsSatisfiedBy(obj) || _rightSide.IsSatisfiedBy(obj);
    }
}

public class NotSpecification<T> : CompositeSpecification<T>
{
    public NotSpecification(Specification<T> leftSide, Specification<T> rightSide)
        : base(leftSide, rightSide)
    {
    }

    public override bool IsSatisfiedBy(T obj)
    {
        return _leftSide.IsSatisfiedBy(obj) && !_rightSide.IsSatisfiedBy(obj);
    }
}

Product Specifications

public class OnSaleSpecificationForProduct : Specification<Product>
{
    public override bool IsSatisfiedBy(Product product)
    {
        return product.IsOnSale;
    }
}

public class PriceGreaterThanSpecificationForProduct : Specification<Product>
{
    private readonly double _price;
    public PriceGreaterThanSpecificationForProduct(double price)
    {
        _price = price;
    }

    public override bool IsSatisfiedBy(Product product)
    {
        return product.Price > _price;
    }
}

public class PriceGreaterThan105 : Specification<Product>
{

    public override bool IsSatisfiedBy(Product product)
    {
        return product.Price > 105;
    }
}

Entity

public class Product
{
    private bool _isOnSale;
    private double _price = 0.0;

    public Product(bool isOnSale)
        : this(isOnSale, 0.0)
    {
        _isOnSale = isOnSale;
    }

    public Product(double price)
        : this(false, price)
    {
        _price = price;
    }

    public Product(bool isOnSale, double price)
    {
        _price = price;
        _isOnSale = isOnSale;
    }

    public bool IsOnSale
    {
        get { return _isOnSale; }
    }

    public double Price
    {
        get { return _price; }
    }
}
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
175 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

By looking at the code you provided, it seems to me that your logic for combining filters is sound. The problem is the List<Specification<T>>. By having compound specification in place, you can combine them and only pass a Specification<T> (which would be a CompositeSpecification<T>):

class Program
{

    static void Main(string[] args)
    {

        List<Product> list = new List<Product>();

        Product p1 = new Product(false, 99);
        Product p2 = new Product(true, 99);
        Product p3 = new Product(true, 101);
        Product p4 = new Product(true, 110);
        Product p5 = new Product(false, 110);

        list.Add(p1);
        list.Add(p2);
        list.Add(p3);
        list.Add(p4);
        list.Add(p5);

        double priceLimit = 100;

         var specification =
             new OnSaleSpecificationForProduct()
                 .And(new PriceGreaterThanSpecificationForProduct(priceLimit)
                              .Or(new PriceGreaterThan105()));

        List<Product> selectedList = ProductFilterHelper.GetProductsBasedOnInputFilters(list, specification);

        Console.ReadKey();
    }

}

And your filtering method becomes:

 public static List<Product> GetProductsUisngDynamicFilters(List<Product> productList, Specification<Product> productSpecification)
    {
        return productList.Where(p => productSpecification.IsSatisfiedBy(p))
                          .ToList();
    }

As a side note, you should consider moving the Or, And and Not method from the abstract Specification<T> to an extension method. And perhaps use interfaces instead.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...