Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I have this class

public class FilterQuery
    {
        public FilterQuery() { }

        public string OrderBy { set; get; }
        public string OrderType { set; get; }        

        public int? Page { set; get; }
        public int ResultNumber { set; get; }

    }

I would like to use it like this

public IQueryable<Listing> FindAll(FilterQuery? filterQuery)

Is this possible?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
405 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

This immediately begs the question of why. Classes are by definition reference types and thus are already nullable. It makes no sense to wrap them in a nullable type.

In your case, you can simply define:

public IQueryable<Listing> FindAll(FilterQuery filterQuery)

and call FindAll(null) to pass no filter query.

If you're using C#/.NET 4.0, a nice option is:

public IQueryable<Listing> FindAll(FilterQuery filterQuery = null)

which means you don't even have to specify the null. An overload would do the same trick in previous versions.

Edit: Per request, the overload would simply look like:

public IQueryable<Listing> FindAll()
{
    return FindAll(null);
}

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...