I'd like to store a JavaScript object in HTML5 localStorage
, but my object is apparently being converted to a string.
(我想将JavaScript对象存储在HTML5 localStorage
,但是我的对象显然正在转换为字符串。)
I can store and retrieve primitive JavaScript types and arrays using localStorage
, but objects don't seem to work.
(我可以使用localStorage
存储和检索原始JavaScript类型和数组,但是对象似乎无法正常工作。)
(应该吗)
Here's my code:
(这是我的代码:)
var testObject = { 'one': 1, 'two': 2, 'three': 3 };
console.log('typeof testObject: ' + typeof testObject);
console.log('testObject properties:');
for (var prop in testObject) {
console.log(' ' + prop + ': ' + testObject[prop]);
}
// Put the object into storage
localStorage.setItem('testObject', testObject);
// Retrieve the object from storage
var retrievedObject = localStorage.getItem('testObject');
console.log('typeof retrievedObject: ' + typeof retrievedObject);
console.log('Value of retrievedObject: ' + retrievedObject);
The console output is
(控制台输出为)
typeof testObject: object
testObject properties:
one: 1
two: 2
three: 3
typeof retrievedObject: string
Value of retrievedObject: [object Object]
It looks to me like the setItem
method is converting the input to a string before storing it.
(在我看来, setItem
方法在存储输入之前将输入转换为字符串。)
I see this behavior in Safari, Chrome, and Firefox, so I assume it's my misunderstanding of the HTML5 Web Storage spec, not a browser-specific bug or limitation.
(我在Safari,Chrome和Firefox中看到了这种行为,因此我认为这是我对HTML5 Web存储规范的误解,而不是浏览器特定的错误或限制。)
I've tried to make sense of the structured clone algorithm described in http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/infrastructure.html .
(我试图弄清http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/infrastructure.html中描述的结构化克隆算法。)
I don't fully understand what it's saying, but maybe my problem has to do with my object's properties not being enumerable (???)(我不完全明白这是什么意思,但也许我的问题与我的对象的属性不可枚举有关(???))
Is there an easy workaround?
(有一个简单的解决方法吗?)
Update: The W3C eventually changed their minds about the structured-clone specification, and decided to change the spec to match the implementations.
(更新:W3C最终改变了对结构化克隆规范的想法,并决定更改规范以匹配实现。)
See https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111 .(参见https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111 。)
So this question is no longer 100% valid, but the answers still may be of interest.(因此,此问题不再100%有效,但答案可能仍然很有趣。)
ask by Kristopher Johnson translate from so