Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

This is a follow up to the question here about acyclic terms. I am now interested in cyclic terms, and it seems their unification is not anymore linear in the Wielemaker-Demoen unification. The test case is basically:

?- X = f(f(X)), Y = f(f(f(Y))), X = Y.
X = Y, Y = f(f(f(Y))).

But we use larger number of function symbol iteration, and we also use arity 2 of the function symbol, and not only arity 1. For n=10,30,50,70 I get this quadratic behaviour, series 1 is the measured time of (=)/2 and series 2 is n*(n+1)/2:

enter image description here

Is there some impossibility theorem that would say unification for cyclic terms cannot be linear. Or otherwise might unification for cyclic terms also fall under the Patterson-Wegman unification, and therefore could be made linear?

Open source:

Linear or Exponential III?
https://gist.github.com/jburse/279b6280ab4311de456e458a7386c1da#file-bart-pl

question from:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65892060/non-linearity-of-wielemaker-demoen-unification

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
760 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

Waitting for answers

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...