Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

If my reading of Mike Ash's "Zeroing Weak References" writeup is correct, weak references are like assign references without ARC. However, if the referenced object is deallocated, instead of getting a "dangling pointer" (meaning a pointer that points to a deallocated object), the pointer gets set to nil.

Is this right, and does this happen with any property marked weak or assign (when ARC is active)?

If this is correct, this would eliminate a lot of SIGABRTs.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
389 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

It's mostly right, but assign properties are still treated the same as they ever were, only weak ones are zeroing. Another caveat is that zeroing weak references are only available in Mac OS X ≥ 10.7 and iOS ≥ 5. While the rest of ARC was backported to 10.6 and iOS 4, weak references cannot be used at all on these OS's.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...