The difference is subtle, but you should opt for the autorelease
versions. Firstly, your code is much more readable. Secondly, on inspection of the optimized assembly output, the autorelease
version is slightly more optimal.
The autorelease
version,
- (NSString *)hello:(NSString *)name {
return [NSString stringWithFormat:@"Hello, %@", name];
}
translates to
"-[SGCAppDelegate hello:]":
push {r7, lr}
movw r1, :lower16:(L_OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_-(LPC0_0+4))
mov r3, r2
movt r1, :upper16:(L_OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_-(LPC0_0+4))
movw r0, :lower16:(L_OBJC_CLASSLIST_REFERENCES_$_-(LPC0_1+4))
movt r0, :upper16:(L_OBJC_CLASSLIST_REFERENCES_$_-(LPC0_1+4))
add r1, pc
add r0, pc
mov r7, sp
ldr r1, [r1]
ldr r0, [r0]
movw r2, :lower16:(L__unnamed_cfstring_-(LPC0_2+4))
movt r2, :upper16:(L__unnamed_cfstring_-(LPC0_2+4))
add r2, pc
blx _objc_msgSend ; stringWithFormat:
pop {r7, pc}
Whereas the [[alloc] init] version looks like the following:
"-[SGCAppDelegate hello:]":
push {r4, r5, r6, r7, lr}
movw r1, :lower16:(L_OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_2-(LPC1_0+4))
add r7, sp, #12
movt r1, :upper16:(L_OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_2-(LPC1_0+4))
movw r0, :lower16:(L_OBJC_CLASSLIST_REFERENCES_$_-(LPC1_1+4))
movt r0, :upper16:(L_OBJC_CLASSLIST_REFERENCES_$_-(LPC1_1+4))
add r1, pc
add r0, pc
ldr r5, [r1]
ldr r6, [r0]
mov r0, r2
blx _objc_retain ; ARC retains the name string temporarily
mov r1, r5
mov r4, r0
mov r0, r6
blx _objc_msgSend ; call to alloc
movw r1, :lower16:(L_OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_4-(LPC1_2+4))
mov r3, r4
movt r1, :upper16:(L_OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_4-(LPC1_2+4))
add r1, pc
ldr r1, [r1]
movw r2, :lower16:(L__unnamed_cfstring_-(LPC1_3+4))
movt r2, :upper16:(L__unnamed_cfstring_-(LPC1_3+4))
add r2, pc
blx _objc_msgSend ; call to initWithFormat:
mov r5, r0
mov r0, r4
blx _objc_release ; ARC releases the name string
mov r0, r5
pop.w {r4, r5, r6, r7, lr}
b.w _objc_autorelease
As expected, it is a little longer, because it is calling the alloc
and initWithFormat:
methods. What is particularly interesting is ARC is generating sub-optimal code here, as it retains the name
string (noted by call to _objc_retain) and later released after the call to initWithFormat:
.
If we add the __unsafe_unretained
ownership qualifier, as in the following example, the code is rendered optimally. __unsafe_unretained
indicates to the compiler to use primitive (copy pointer) assignment semantics.
- (NSString *)hello:(__unsafe_unretained NSString *)name {
return [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"Hello, %@", name];
}
as follows:
"-[SGCAppDelegate hello:]":
push {r4, r7, lr}
movw r1, :lower16:(L_OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_2-(LPC1_0+4))
add r7, sp, #4
movt r1, :upper16:(L_OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_2-(LPC1_0+4))
movw r0, :lower16:(L_OBJC_CLASSLIST_REFERENCES_$_-(LPC1_1+4))
movt r0, :upper16:(L_OBJC_CLASSLIST_REFERENCES_$_-(LPC1_1+4))
add r1, pc
add r0, pc
mov r4, r2
ldr r1, [r1]
ldr r0, [r0]
blx _objc_msgSend
movw r1, :lower16:(L_OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_4-(LPC1_2+4))
mov r3, r4
movt r1, :upper16:(L_OBJC_SELECTOR_REFERENCES_4-(LPC1_2+4))
add r1, pc
ldr r1, [r1]
movw r2, :lower16:(L__unnamed_cfstring_-(LPC1_3+4))
movt r2, :upper16:(L__unnamed_cfstring_-(LPC1_3+4))
add r2, pc
blx _objc_msgSend
.loc 1 31 1
pop.w {r4, r7, lr}
b.w _objc_autorelease