Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I saw this in one of Heinz Kabutz's Java Specialist newsletter editions and, although the rest (and indeed, all) of Dr. Kabutz's articles are well-explained and detailed, he seemed to gloss over what this code is doing, or more importantly, what it's significance is:

public class SomeObject {
    private Object lock1;
    private Object lock2;

    public void doSomething() {
        synchronized(lock1) {
            synchronized(lock2) {
                // ...
            }
        }
    }
}

What are the implications of nesting synchronized blocks? How does this affect different threads attempting to doSomething()?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
702 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

There are 2 possible issues that one would have to watch out for

  1. Nested locks can result in deadlocks quite easily if one is using wait/notify. Here is an explanation of why. http://tutorials.jenkov.com/java-concurrency/nested-monitor-lockout.html

  2. One should be wary that if another method wishes to lock the same two objects, they must always do it in the same order, otherwise there is the possibility of another deadlock situation as explained in this post: How to avoid Nested synchronization and the resulting deadlock


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...