Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

Here is a C# program that tries Marshal.SizeOf on a few different types:

using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;

[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
class AClass { }

[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] 
struct AStruct { }

[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
class B { AClass value; }

[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
class C<T> { T value; }

class Program
{
    static void M(object o) { Console.WriteLine(Marshal.SizeOf(o)); }

    static void Main()
    {
        M(new AClass());
        M(new AStruct());
        M(new B());
        M(new C<AStruct>());
        M(new C<AClass>());
    }
}

The first four calls to M() succeed, but on the last one, SizeOf throws an ArgumentException:

"Type 'C`1[AClass]' cannot be marshaled as an unmanaged structure; no meaningful size or offset can be computed."

Why? Specifically, why does SizeOf choke on C<AClass>, but not on B or on C<AStruct>?


EDIT: Because it was asked about in the comments, here's the "real-world" problem that inspired this mostly-academic question: I'm calling into a C API that is basically one C function that operates on (pointers to) lots of different types of simple C structures. All contain a common header followed by one field, but the type of that field is different in different structures. A flag in the header indicates the type of the field. (Strange, yes, but that's what I have to work with).

If I could define a single generic type C<T> and a single C# extern declaration M(C<T>), and then call M(C<int>) on one line, and M(C<double>) on another, I'd have a short and sweet interop solution. But given JaredPar's answer, it appears that I have to make a separate C# type for each structure (though inheritance can provide the common header).

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
306 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

Generics as a rule are not supported in any interop scenario. Both P/Invoke and COM Interop will fail if you attempt to marshal a generic type or value. Hence I would expect Marshal.SizeOf to be untested or unsupported for this scenario as it is a marshal-specific function.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...