Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

i can't understand the difference between a simple bare

Public ClassName() {}

and

Public ClassName() : this(null) {}

I know I can use it only if i have a +1 overloaded ctor, but I can't understand the advantages of defining the parameterless constructor this way.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
193 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

This permits the single-param constructor to have all the logic, so it isn't repeated.

public ClassName() : this(null) {}

public ClassName(string s)
{
    // logic (code)
    if (s != null) {
        // more logic
    }
    // Even more logic
}

I hope it's clear that the "logic" and "even more logic" would have needed to be repeated in the parameterless constructor if not for the this(null).


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...