Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
menu search
person
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

I would like to pose this as a question to this answer but I can't seem to do so, I apologize.

Extending the defaults for the subclass are reflected in the superclass. This seems to defeat the purpose and I'm more apt to explicitly list the superclass' defaults in the subclass to get the structure I'm looking for.

var Inventory = Backbone.Model.extend({
    defaults: {
        cat: 3,
        dog: 5
    }
});

var ExtendedInventory = Inventory.extend({
});

_.extend(ExtendedInventory.prototype.defaults, {rabbit: 25});

var i = new Inventory();
var ei = new ExtendedInventory();
console.log(i.attributes);
console.log(ei.attributes);

This outputs:

{cat: 3, dog: 5, rabbit: 25}
{cat: 3, dog: 5, rabbit: 25}

Not what I (nor, I assume, the op) want:

{cat: 3, dog: 5}
{cat: 3, dog: 5, rabbit: 25}
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
252 views
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Answer

The problem is that Inventory.prototype.defaults and Extended.prototype.defaults has the same reference, because you have not override the reference.

So you can do this in 2 ways, maybe more but i only found this 2:

Edit: The first example is incorrect (see comments); please refer to the second.

var ExtendedInventory = Inventory.extend({
    defaults: {
        rabit:25
    }
});

_.extend(ExtendedInventory.prototype.defaults, Inventory.prototype.defaults);

or

var ExtendedInventory = Inventory.extend({
    defaults: _.extend({},Inventory.prototype.defaults,
         {rabit:25}
    )
});

I think the first looks cleaner.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
thumb_up_alt 0 like thumb_down_alt 0 dislike
Welcome to ShenZhenJia Knowledge Sharing Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
...